Elementary college college students, college students with disabilities extra prone to be restrained at faculties
The data collected as a result of changes to the state’s law of restraint and seclusion also shows that elementary school students and pupils with disabilities were more likely to be withheld or withdrawn. The 30 schools that reported the most seclusion incidents were all elementary schools.
Joanne Juhnke, special education advocacy specialist at Disability Rights Wisconsin, said the practices are more common at lower grade levels because of the size of students and “relative ease of physically overwhelming smaller children”. However, there are special costs for children of primary school age.
“This happens with young children, children who are having an impressive time, and it can result in emotional damage becoming physically overwhelmed or trapped in an empty little room that they cannot get out of,” she said.
RELATED: 7 Candidates Vying For The State’s Top Educational Position Emphasize COVID Recovery During The Forum
RELATED: Government Agency Releases Report on Impact of Widespread School Closures Linked to COVID-19
State law defines restraint as a restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of students to move their torso, arms, legs, or head freely. and seclusion as the involuntary restriction of students apart from other students in a room or area that they physically prevent from leaving. It is intended to be used as a last resort and response to a crisis rather than a disciplinary measure, said Barb Van Haren, deputy superior of state in the Department of Learning Support at DPI.
“(State law) prohibits its use in general, and ensures that it is used only when the behavior presents a clear, present, and imminent risk to the physical safety of the student – the student (detained or withdrawn). Himself yourself, other students or other employees. “
Some of the schools with the highest number of incidents of seclusion reported using the tactic on a large proportion of their students with disabilities in the 2019-2020 school year.
At Butte des Morts Elementary School in Menasha, 20 of the 217 students who withdrew and 20 of the 256 who were withheld were students with disabilities – nearly a quarter of the school’s 81 students with disabilities.
Similarly, Sheboygans Jackson Elementary reported that 19 out of 79 disabled students were withdrawn and 13 treated with reluctance. A total of 72 students were withheld and 144 withdrawn.
Milwaukee, the state’s largest school district, graduated 52 students and withheld 331, including voucher students at private and charter schools who also had to report to DPI. Students with disabilities made up 71% of those who dropped out and 57% of those who were withheld.
Van Haren works with schools to develop alternatives to restraint or seclusion. She said that schools that have adopted a “trauma-informed” model tend to be better off reducing the use of these last resort measures.
“I really think that a mental health framework and a trauma-informed care approach are essential,” she said. “We have to be able to recognize and address (trauma).”
This is the first year schools have had to report the number of incidents of seclusion and reluctance to state agency. Schools used to send this data to their school authorities, but Juhnke is confident that the nationwide view will push schools with higher rates to resources and alternatives.
“The data itself is a huge step forward in helping families see what’s going on in their districts. So districts can see what’s going on in other schools, what is going on in other districts. So organizations can see where they are who are. ” Trouble spots and where more help is needed, “said Juhnke.
There are no federal laws regulating the policy of seclusion and restraint in schools, although attempts have been made to pass laws at the national level over the past decade. In Wisconsin, a coalition has been pushing for changes in state policy for restraint and seclusion for years. Juhnke’s organization, as well as children’s advocacy groups, Wisconsin FACETS and Wisconsin Family Ties, requested changes that incident reports get into the hands of families to encourage debriefing and re-evaluations of students’ individual curricula after reluctance or seclusion was applied to schools Submit their data to DPI, all of which made it into the legislative changes signed in March 2020.
The group still sees a lot of work to do, however – Juhnke said they would like the data to be broken down by how often law enforcement officers do the reluctance. She also wants private and charter schools that guide public students through the Milwaukee, Racine, and statewide voucher programs to submit seclusion and retention dates for all of their voucher students, not just those participating in the special needs scholarship program. Ultimately, said Juhnke, she would like to see schools do away with seclusion altogether.
“How do you get a child who is so out of control as to pose a physical hazard into a seclusion?” She said. “You have to physically overwhelm this child to get him into the seclusion room – why is the seclusion room necessary when you will already be using restraints?”
Even among the changes made over the past year, the data reported to DPI is limited – it is only broken down by disability status. not by race, gender, age or any other demographic distinction.
“We disproportionately know that our color students are often overrepresented in disciplinary numbers, and while we didn’t collect this data on seclusion and reluctance, we know it from suspensions and expulsions,” said Van Haren.
The data reported this year are also incomplete. With schools closed in March, 2019-2020 dates only reflect part of the year. The current school year is unlikely to provide much clarity as many school districts have not held classes in school buildings, making it impossible for them to compare this type of disciplinary data to schools that are personal.
Looking ahead, however, Van Haren said she had some concerns that children coming out of the pandemic could experience more trauma, which could result in staff holding or holding students back if they fail to understand why students are acting or acting don’t know how to de-escalate these situations.
“Having school social workers, school counselors, school psychologists, etc; I think it is essential to have good staff training in trauma-sensitive schools and mental health,” she said.
As in so many cases, according to Juhnke, what matters is that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure – keeping the class size small enough that teachers aren’t overwhelmed and funding individual help for students who need it and to use student planning meetings with individual curricula and other special study plans to find out what might be triggering the students and how to deal with the situation if they act.
“There are all of these planning opportunities to think about what the obstacles are. How do we teach these students to self-regulate? What triggers do we need to avoid?” She said. “If you have the school’s commitment and the resources, these are the best approaches.”
Wisconsin Public Radio can be heard locally on 91.3 KUWS-FM and on wpr.org.
Wisconsin Public Radio, Copyright 2021, University of Wisconsin System Regency Council and Wisconsin Educational Communications Board.